In referring to the subconscious and conscious minds, or the objective and subjective, which is the technically correct expression, “We have two minds which, although related, are distinct” or “We have one mind with two distinct functions?”
The correct expression is, “We have one mind with two distinct functions.” There are not two minds.
Are the Devil in religion, the Negative in Science, and the Bad in Philosophy merely imaginary manifestations of thought energy, or shall we class them as wrong yet real manifestations? If all that we have and are and all of our powers come from one eternal source, to what must we attribute these imaginary entities?
These are not imaginary entities. They are simply perversions. If you use electricity for light, you call it good. If you grasp a wire which has not been properly insulated and it kills you, it is not for that reason bad or evil. You were simply careless or ignorant of the laws governing electricity. For the same reason, the one Infinite Power, which is the source of all Power, manifests in your life either as good or as evil, as you make use of it constructively or destructively.
Is not the Master Key Idea of “God” Pantheistic?
This depends entirely upon your idea of Pantheism. Pantheism is a loose term and may be interpreted in various ways. For instance, Pantheism conceives the Universe to be one eternal, involuntary evolution of an Infinite Being, as contrasted with Atheism, which is a positive denial of the Divine Immanence, and Agnosticism, as a dogmatic doubt of the existence of God.
Is this right?
Truth is absolute, but conception of truth varies with the individual consciousness. Therefore, no one can say when the ultimate truth has been reached because no one can say when the individual consciousness has been developed to the point where further development is impossible.
Yes, truth is absolute, but the conception of truth varies with the individual consciousness. On the other hand, truth is not a matter of belief. It is a matter of demonstration. It is not a question of authority, but a question of perception.
Since the real “I” is spiritual and therefore perfect, and since it “controls and directs both the body and mind,” how is it that we see such imperfect results?
We see no imperfect results. We see nothing but perfection. Perfection means that the Law operates with immutable precision.Spiritual law always operates perfectly. If the individual thinks constructively, results are constructive and harmonious. If he thinks destructively, he reaps exactly what he sows. The Law works perfectly. We see no imperfect results whatever. We may freely choose what we think, but the result of our thought is governed by an immutable law.
What is Life?
Life is that quality or principle of the Universal Energy which manifests in so-called organic objects as growth and voluntary activity, and which is usually coexistent in some degree with some manifestation of that same Universal Energy as the quality or principle termed intelligence. You must understand that there is only one Supreme Principle, evading all comprehension of its essential nature. It is the Absolute. Man can think only in terms of the relative. Therefore, he sometimes defines It as the Universal Intelligence, the Universal Substance, as Ether, Life, Mind, Spirit, Energy, Truth, Love, etc. His particular definition at any moment is governed by the particular relationship of the phenomena of Being in which he thinks of this Principle at that moment.
How is the law governing success or prosperity placed in operation?
The human brain is the finest and most vibrant mechanism in existence. Every time you think you send a message into the formless energy from which and by which all things are created, this starts a train of causation which relates with the things that correspond with the image of your thought. If your thought is sufficiently refined and concentrated, then you will be placed in harmony with the object of your thought quickly; if not, more time will be required. Most persons are busily engaged in concentrating upon lack, limitation, loss, and inharmony of every kind, and they are therefore attracting these conditions, a few are busily engaged in concentrating upon success, prosperity, and harmonious conditions generally, and find that their environment reflects the quality of their thought.
How is prayer answered?
The Universal Mind, the Omnipotent Power, the Supreme Being, does not change the modus operandi of the Universe in order to comply with our requests, nor does it make exception, but it does act through well known laws, and these laws can be placed into operation, consciously or unconsciously, by accident or design. It is the operation of this marvelous law of attraction which has caused men in all ages and in all times to believe that there must be a personal Being who responded to their petitions and manipulated events in order to meet their demands.
You correctly state that “Possession depends on use.” How can this fact be best explained to show that this is the only way in which to acquire a “reservoir of power, possession, etc.,” to draw on in time of emergency, etc.?
By illustration: A man desires to strengthen his arm. He wishes it to become powerful. He does not conserve what strength he has in the arm by binding it to his side. If he did this, he would soon lose what strength he already had. On the contrary, he begins to use it, he begins to exercise it, and he finds that the more he uses it, the more strength is secured. The more he gives of his strength, the more he gets. The same rule applies in regard to mental and spiritual strength
“Unless we are willing to think we shall have to work, and the less we think the more we shall work, and the less we shall get for our work.” Is it possible to conceive of a world in which there are no “hewers of wood?”
Thought has taken much drudgery out of work, but much so-called “scientific management” and “efficiency and engineering systems” look upon millions of human beings as mere machines capable of making so many motions less or more per hour.
To labor is to serve and all service is honorable. But a “hewer of wood” contemplates blind service instead of intelligent service. Labor is the creative instinct in manifestation. Owing to the changes which have taken place in the industrial world, the creative instinct no longer finds expression. A man cannot build his own house, he cannot even make his own garden, he can by no means direct his own labor. He is therefore deprived of the greatest joy which can come to man, the joy of achieving, of creating, of accomplishing, and so this great power is perverted and turned into destructive channels. He can construct nothing for himself so he begins to destroy the works of his more fortunate fellows. Labor is however, finding that the Universe is not a chaos but a cosmos, that it is governed by immutable laws, that every condition is the result of a cause and that the same cause invariably produces the same effect. It is finding that these causes are mental, that thought predetermines action. It is finding that constructive thought brings about constructive conditions and destructive thought brings about destructive conditions.
You say that “Life is an unfoldment, not accretion; what comes to us in the world without is what we already possess in the world within.” Do you not take into consideration knowledge a person acquires from books, experiences, etc.?
You can derive absolutely no benefit from books, experiences, environment, or anything else until you have created brain cells capable of receiving the thought. Your world within is an exact correspondence of your world without. Suppose for the moment that you are unfamiliar with the Hebrew language. A book might be given to you with the most beautiful thoughts written in the most wonderful language, but it would mean nothing to you until you had made yourself acquainted with the Hebrew language, and so with everything else. No thought, no idea, no experience has any value for us until we are capable of receiving it. For this reason the same thought would make absolutely no impression upon one man, while it would be received with amazement and delight by another. The first man has formed no brain cells capable of receiving it. The second man is ready for it. He understands the beauties contained in the idea.
Is it correct to say that true religion and true science are “twins” and that the death of one means the death of the other? Why?
True science and true religion are certainly twins. There can be no death for either, because what is true cannot die. “The essential characteristic of truth is steadfast fidelity to order and Law. The mind takes offense at every phenomena of both inner and outer experience which appears to contract that steadiness and constancy which it regards as the very essence of truth.” You will see that this applies to both science and religion. What is true in science must be true in religion. There cannot be a scientific truth and a religious truth. All truth is one and indivisible.
How do Materialism and Spiritualism find harmony in the Master Key System?
The Master Key System teaches that there is but one Principle, or One Power. That everything which exists is a materialization of this One Power. The power itself is Spiritual but the manifestation of the Power is material. One is subjective and the other objective. Two phases of one being. We find this everywhere in Nature, Man is a spiritual being, but he also has a material body. Spirit must manifest upon the objective plane in an objective manner. Spiritualism in this sense has nothing whatever to do with what is usually considered spiritualistic phenomena.
What explanation is to be given of the fact that although a great majority of the people not only in the United States but throughout Europe are sick of war and want only peace and a return to prosperous normal conditions, that the return of the desired normal prosperous conditions is such a slow, hard process?
There is, of course, as you say, no desire on the part of anyone for more war, just as there is no desire for poverty, crime, or for any other destructive condition, but there is, on the other hand, a conscious and a subconscious desire for the things which bring about war, destruction, poverty, and crime, and this lust of power or separation is the old question of “who is to be the greatest in the kingdom?”
The law is not a respecter of persons. This is true concerning nations as well as individuals. Nations as well as individuals will eventually learn that force can always be met with equal if not superior force and for this reason can never be the determining factor of any situation.
Objective harmony can come only as a result of subjective harmony, and subjective harmony can come only as a result of vision, understanding, and perception.
In the “Acme of Achievement” aimed at by the Master Key System, how is it possible to ignore Theology?
A few centuries ago it was thought that we must choose between the Bible and Galileo. Fifty years ago it was thought that we must choose between the Bible and Darwin, but as Dean W. R. Inge, of St. Paul’s Cathedral, London, says: “Every educated man knows that the main facts of organic evolution are firmly established, and that they are quite different from the legends borrowed by the ancient Hebrews from the Babylonians. We are not required to do violence to our reason by rejecting the assured results of modern research. Traditional Christianity must be simplified and spiritualized. It is at present encumbered by bad science and caricatured by bad economics and the more convinced we are of this, the less disposed we shall be to stake the existence of our faith on superstitions which are the religion of the religious and the science of the unscientific.
What is the meaning of the statement, “Only five percent have the vision to annex the strategic position, to see and feel a thing before it happens?”
Ninety-five percent of the people are busy attempting to change effects. Something happens which they do not like and they try to change the situation. They soon find that they are simply changing one form of distress for another. The other five percent are busily engaged with causes. They know that in order to make any permanent change it is the cause which they must seek. They soon find that the cause is within their control. It is the five percent that do the thinking, and the ninety-five percent which merely accept the thought of others. It is those only who think who can see and feel a thing before it happens.
What, more explicitly, is to be understood by the term “polarity” as applied to the mental process?
Polarity is the tendency or inclination of a thought or feeling in a particular direction. When we think along certain lines continuously the thought becomes polarized, we can see other and different points of view with difficulty or not at all.
What is Truth?
Truth is the imperative condition of all well-being. To be sure, to know the truth, and to stand confidently on it is a satisfaction beside which no other is comparable. Truth is the underlying verity, the condition precedent in every business or social relation. Truth is the only solid ground in a world of conflict and doubt and danger.
Every act not in harmony with Truth, whether through ignorance or design, cuts the ground from under our feet and leads to discord, inevitable loss, and confusion, for while the humblest mind can accurately foretell the result of every correct action, the greatest, most profound, and penetrating mind loses its way hopelessly and can form no conception of the results due to a departure from correct principles.
How are Germs created?
Creation consists in the art of combining forces which have an affinity for each other, in the proper proportion, thus oxygen and hydrogen combined in the proper proportions produce water. Oxygen and hydrogen are both invisible gases but water is visible. Germs, however, have life; they must therefore be the product of something which has life or intelligence. Spirit is the only Creative Principle in the Universe, and Thought is the only activity which spirit possesses. Therefore, germs must be the result of a mental process.
A thought goes forth from the thinker, it meets other thoughts for which it has an affinity, they coalesce and form a nucleus for other similar thoughts; this nucleus sends out calls into the formless energy, wherein all thoughts and all things are held in solution, and soon the thought is clothed in a form in accordance with the character given to it by the thinker.
A million men in the agony of death and torture on the battlefield send out thoughts of hatred and distress, soon another million men die from the effect of a germ called “influenza.” None but the experienced metaphysician knows when and how the deadly germ came into existence.
As there are an infinite variety of thoughts, so there are an infinite variety of germs, constructive as well as destructive, but neither the constructive nor the destructive germ will germinate and flourish until it finds congenial soil in which to take root.
What has given rise to the idea of Reincarnation?
The germ plasma in each generation always contains the sum of all that has passed before it. The nucleus of every cell contains the chromosome and these reproduce the species, nature and condition according to definite law. Each chromosome, microscopically small as it is, contains the elements of every other cell that forms the many kinds of cells in a matured body, plus characteristics of species, plus characteristics of form and appearance, plus family resemblance, plus nature, plus mind, plus matured tendencies, plus everything that makes personality and individuality. We are then physically exactly what our forefathers were, plus environment and education. It is this persistency of the identity of the individual chromosome from generation to generation which has given rise to the idea of reincarnation.
What is Black Magic?
The idea that there is a phenomenon called Black Magic is attributable to credulity, superstition, and a lack of understanding of the laws governing in the mental world. All thoughts and all things are held in solution in the Universal Mind. The individual may open his mental gates and thereby become receptive to thoughts of any kind or description. If he thinks that there are magicians, witches, or wizards who are desirous of injuring him, he is thereby opening the door for the entrance of such thoughts and he will be able to say with Job, “The things I feared have come upon me.” If, on the contrary, he thinks that there are those who are desirous of helping him, he thereby opens the door for such help, and he will find that “as thy faith is, so be it unto thee” is as true today as it was two thousand years ago.
I do not seem to grasp fully the application of the law of vibration to the thought world. How, for instance, are we to change the rate of vibration here? In what direction shall it be changed to produce best results?
Every thought changes the rate of vibration. As you are enabled to think greater, deeper, higher, and more forceful thoughts, the brain cells are refined, they become more powerful, and they are enabled to receive finer vibrations. This is not only true in the mental and spiritual world but in the physical world. As the ear becomes trained in music it is enabled to receive finer vibrations, until the trained musician can hear harmonies of sound of which the ordinary person is entirely unaware.
Amid the seeming chaos of present day conditions, is it not easy to discern the coming of that dawn of which all the great ones of earth have foretold, the second coming or the Millennium?
One of the characteristic signs of a general awakening is the optimism shining through the mist of doubt and unrest, this optimism is taking the form of illumination, as the illumination becomes general, fear, anger, doubt, selfishness ,and greed pass away. We are not looking for the Christ child, but the Christ consciousness — we are anticipating a more general realization of the Truth which is to make men free. That there may be one man or one woman who shall first realize this Truth in the new era is barely possible, but the preponderance of evidence is for a more general awakening to the Light of Illumination.
You speak about the originating mind that forms, upholds, sustains, and creates all there is. Does this explain the source from which comes man’s ability to think lack, to think war and crime, etc.?
Yes, this includes man’s ability to think lack, war, and crime. If he can think constructive thought he can also think destructive thought, but as soon as man learns that thinking is a creative process, that we are creators not creatures, he will discontinue the process of thinking destruction for himself and his fellows.
You are, without doubt, correct in stating that Carlyle’s attitude of hatred of the bad was not conducive toward his own best development; on the other hand, what should be the attitude toward the giant evils of the day, such as war, graft, murder, vice, theft and the like? Is it not often true that a tearing down, a clearing away of the brush piles, so to speak, must precede constructive work?
No, it is not true. The tearing down process is not at all necessary. We do not need to laboriously shovel the darkness out of a room before letting in the light; on the contrary, all that is necessary is to turn on the light and the darkness vanishes; likewise, if but one-tenth of one per cent of the money and effort was spent in constructive work that is now being spent in destructive work, the giant evils of the day to which you refer would disappear as if by magic.
The unit of the Nation is the individual. The Government represents only the average intelligence of the units comprising that Nation. Therefore, our work is with the unit. When the thought of the individual has been changed, the collective thought will take care of itself, but we try to reverse the process. We try to change governments instead of individuals, which cannot be done. But with a little intelligent organized effort, the present destructive thought could be readily changed into constructive thought.
I am up to part 3 and I have a question .
I sit and relax and inhibit my thoughts and I cancel each thought by taking no thought as I have been in part 2.
It then says to relax ? Does this mean I can now slouch in my chair instead of being upright and open my eyes then shut them and relax each part of my body ,or am I suppose to just continue being perfectly still and just relax my mind by not inhibiting my thoughts and relax each body part using my mind?
Hi Tim!
Excellent question. It sounds like you are doing the exercise for Week Two correctly. For more information on that, please see http://masterkeycoaching.com/2017/05/the-most-misunderstood-exercise-of-the-master-key-system-and-how-to-understand-it-perfectly/.
For the exercise for Week Three, Mr. Haanel does indeed ask you to relax. This does not mean to slouch or to recline. Think of it more as a military “at ease”: your back will be straight, your feet firmly on the ground, your neck and head vertical. Become poised. When you’re in that position, then just . . . relax. Lose the tension. Don’t hold it, rather, ALLOW it.
As you follow the exercises, keep in mind that each one builds on the next. Thus, is Week One, you were asked to sit a certain way; so, keep doing it. Every Week, you are to “inhibit” your thoughts (that is, you are to monitor and control your thoughts, you’re not to let your mind wander). And, from Week Three onward, you are to be relaxed, “at ease.”
For more on Week Three, please see http://masterkeycoaching.com/2017/08/charlie-say-relax/.
I hope this helps! Be incredible!
Have fun … Anthony.
Hi there.
I’m.up to week four but I can say I have mastered the 3 previous weeks even thou it took me about 5 weeks to do.
Im having trouble with lesson 4.
Letting my emotions go …
I have a work colegue that constantly rides me at my job, and does alot of things slyly to get on my nerves which is making number 4 very hard for me to complete. Every morning before work I study the master key and I also forgive this person and let it go I then go to work in good spirits and then have this person trying to break me every day lol.
Before I started the master key I would get right back in his face but I have been doing my best to control my emotions and not retaliate but in the process I know look like a weak target …..
So I’m caught in between from using the teachings of master key and not letting things bother me but constantly having to blunt my anger and knocking this guys head off ..hahaha I know this must be a different question but has anyone had dealings like this .. what do you do to keep true to your path?
Hi Tim!
I think everyone has had — or continues to have — an issue like this. That “other person.” It’s a tricky situation. So, here are a couple of possibilities.
First, have a chat with him. Whether you’re on equal footing within the organization or he’s above you, sit him down and have a little talk. Be bold!
Another option is to ignore. I don’t know if that’s a possibility.
The bottom line is to use The Master Key System to find a SOLUTION. It’s all about solutions! So, think it through. Try to imagine HIS motives for riding you and then work from there for a solution.
Let us know how it works out!
Anthony.
Hi everyone ! I’ ve read an internet article that only 0,1% of cases applied the law of attraction are succesful. Is this right?
Are there real stories of people that actually applied the procedure and had really results?
And finally how all this knowledge is scientificaly proven and came in position to Charnes Haanel?
Thanks a lot!
Hi Alexandros!
Thank you for your comment. The statistic that the Law of Attraction works only 0.1% of the time is incorrect because the LOA is in action and works 100% of the time. We, each and every one of us, is “attracting” what is in one’s consciousness — what one is thinking predominantly and actually believes. The stories of peoples’ success with the LOA are numerous; though, that is an incorrect way to phrase it as when a person learns how to THINK and to CONTROL one’s thoughts, then that is when the LOA seems to “work.” For much more information, please see https://Haanel.com. I wish you all the BEST!
Anthony.
Hi,
I’m on week 4 of the system and I have a strange problem (or none at all). Since I’ve gotten good at inhibiting thought and relaxing my body while doing so, I lose all emotions except for a feeling of peace when I go to do the exercise. The first day I noticed a few sensations of unease in different parts of my body when I thought about letting go of negative emotions, but those passed and if I don’t tell myself to release the negative emotions, I don’t feel anything remotely negative or uncomfortable.
I guess what I’m asking is: Is it normal to not feel anything when I’m not thinking of anything, or are there emotions I need to get rid of that I can’t feel?
I finish my sessions (20 minutes) feeling relaxed and refreshed and ever since week 2 (once I got better at not thinking) the only thoughts that cross my mind during are bits of song which I ask to please go. I have no emotional reaction to them other than a brief feeling of enjoyment, then I’m back to silent and peaceful.
Just curious if there’s something I’m missing here or if I’m doing the exercise correctly.
Thank you!
, Mike
Hi Mike!
Thank you for your wonderful question. It sounds like you are doing it all quite correctly! With regards to the feeling you get when you “tell” yourself to release those emotions: that, again, sounds about right. You see, what Mr. Haanel is teaching is to bypass that “verbal” circuit. Yes, words come into play and the pictures we paint with the words play a part, we are to aim for VISUALIZING completely and thoroughly.
Does this make sense?
I apologise for the tardy response to your query. Somehow the notifications got turned off for me. Let’s see if I fixed that!
THANK YOU! Please let me know if I can be of service to you.
All the BEST!
Anthony Raymond.
Thank you, Anthony.
No need for apology, I was a bit late in making my remark 😉
I truly appreciate your response. I’m on week 12 now and having a good time experiencing things I already have which are the substance of Faith 🙂
That is FANTASTIC!
What is profound about the exercises is that, like a physical exercise, build and prepare the “mind” entirely, while at the same time each individual exercise has a singular, practical purpose. Sitting and being still (Exercise One) is the starting point for everything that follows AND is, in and of itself, an amazing and admirable skill to possess.
The exercise from Week Twelve is rather excellent. Here’s an article I wrote about it: https://themasterkeymentor.com/the-exercise-for-week-twelve-of-the-master-key-system-broken-down-and-explained/
Enjoy! Keep going! All the BEST!
Anthony.
Thanks. so much again!
I actually read this article to prep for this week. Your site has been my go-to for a good while now.
I truly appreciate all the work you’ve done. It’s inspiring!
Thank you, once more 🙂
Hi Anthony,
How do I know if I’ve attained full control of my physical being? Also after finishing the exercise, do I just go about my day?
You will know. It just . . . happens.
And yes, go about your day.
Every day and in every way you’re getting better and better!
AR.
Also one more detail… it seems I’m only able to do exercise 1 for 5 to 7 minutes before my body moves and takes me out of the exercise on its own. So I moved on to part 2 but I worry that I haven’t mastered part 1 yet
You’re doing fine. Keep practicing and you’re are good for moving to the next one. They all come together and build upon each other.
AR.
Hi Anthony,
I have a question. You suggest that a person should simply read the Master Key System from cover to cover before getting to work with actually studying the system and doing the exercises. But I purchased the Master Key Workbook to aid me in my study of the Master Key System. Should I read the workbook from cover to cover as well before studying it more thoroughly?
Thank You Sir.
You can do either. The Workbook is a separate entity and while it follows the MKS, it is not dependent on it. I recommend reading thru the MKS so as to acclimate oneself to the writing style and jargon, as well as to familiarize oneself with what’s coming next. There isn’t much of that in the Workbook as it is rather straight-forward.
You will do well! Keep going!
AR.
Understood. Thank You for the quick and informative response.
You’re welcome! I wish you and yours a Most Merry Christmas and a Super-Spectacular New Year! All the BEST!
AR.